|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Six Universal Attributes of a Great Mark |
|
|
|
If we weren't in the room when the decisions were
made, if we don't know what the CEO's intentions were, how can we say one
logo is "better" than another?
As in ice skating, technical merit
can be judged independently of communications content, and we can all see
the skater fall. The first five things that distinguish great marks from
ordinary ones are technical; the last one addresses content. Great marks are
always:
1. Distinctive. The design idea need not be unique in the
world, just distinctive enough so you can "own" it in your particular
marketplace.
2. Practical. Can be printed small, in ink or
pixels; works in black on white as well as in colors; works in reverse too,
white on black. (Faces, human or animal, usually flunk this last test; the
eyes turn white.)
3. Graphic. Communicates purely in visual
terms, to the right brain hemisphere; doesn't depend on verbal, intellectual
interpretation. (Example: Tenneco seriously considered and rejected a
"10ECO" logo design. Clever, but it's not a mark, it's a pun.) If a
wordmark, it can be recognized by form alone (you don't have to "read"
Coca-Cola's logo more than once or twice).
4. Simple in form.
Contains only one graphic idea, one gimmick, one dingbat. Thus if there's a
symbol, the accompanying name is plain and unadorned. And if it is a
wordmark, one idea or device makes it special-like IBM's stripes. (The more
unique the name, the simpler the graphics can be.)
5. One
message. In content too, great designs try to express
no more than one
attribute (such as stature or speed or dynamism) and support a single aspect
of positioning.
6. Appropriate. In the end, of course, the
content's got to be right. An otherwise-great mark fails if the reputation,
positioning, and personality expressed are at odds with management
intentions. -T.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
